The WIL-HELM AGENCY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loretta LYNN, Defendant-Appellee.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section. https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Permission to Appeal Denied June 29, 1981.
Charles H. Warfield and Stephen K. Rush, Farris, Warfield & Kanady, Nashville, for plaintiff-appellant.
Harlan Dodson and Harlan Dodson, III, Nashville, for defendant-appellee.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section.Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court June 29, 1981.
The Wil-Helm Agency sues for damages due to the breach of a theatrical agency contract entered into between the agency and Loretta Lynn, an artist. Loretta Lynn filed a counterclaim wherein she avers that the agency breached the contract and, therefore, owes her damages and she further alleges that the agency released her from the contract. The chancellor found that the agency had.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.